How do I implement canary releases for TLS termination?

Discover how to implement canary releases for TLS termination effectively using modern DevOps practices. This guide provides an example of setting up TLS termination with canary deployments to ensure seamless application updates.
canary releases, TLS termination, DevOps, deployment strategies, load balancing, application updates
<?php // Sample canary release configuration using NGINX for TLS termination server { listen 443 ssl; server_name example.com; ssl_certificate /etc/ssl/certs/example.crt; ssl_certificate_key /etc/ssl/private/example.key; location / { proxy_pass http://backend; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; } } upstream backend { server app.v1.example.com; // Stable version server app.canary.example.com; // Canary version } ?>

canary releases TLS termination DevOps deployment strategies load balancing application updates

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?