Canary releases are an essential part of modern deployment strategies, allowing teams to test new features with a small segment of users before a wider rollout. This implementation guides you on how to effectively use tagging strategies for canary releases.
canary releases, tagging strategies, deployment, DevOps, software development, feature rollout
Here’s how to implement canary releases with tagging strategies:
<?php
// Assuming you have a list of users
$users = getAllUsers();
$canaryGroup = array_slice($users, 0, 50); // Selecting 50 users for the canary release
foreach ($canaryGroup as $user) {
// Mark user for new feature
Tag::attach($user, 'canary_feature');
// Enable feature for the canary group
FeatureToggle::enable('new_feature', $user);
}
// Monitor the canary group's feedback and performance
$feedback = collectCanaryFeedback($canaryGroup);
if ($feedback->isPositive()) {
// Roll out to everyone else
foreach ($users as $user) {
Tag::attach($user, 'new_feature');
}
} else {
// Revert the feature if feedback is not positive
foreach ($canaryGroup as $user) {
FeatureToggle::disable('new_feature', $user);
}
}
?>
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?