Canary releases are a crucial strategy in DevOps and Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) practices that allow teams to deploy changes gradually, minimizing the risk of widespread failures. By deploying a new feature or change to a small subset of users before rolling it out to everyone, teams can monitor performance and identify potential issues early on.
The basic steps of implementing a canary release include:
Here’s an example of configuring a canary release using a traffic splitting mechanism in a Kubernetes environment:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
spec:
containers:
- name: my-app
image: my-app:v1.0
- name: my-app-canary
image: my-app:v1.1
ports:
- containerPort: 80
---
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: my-app-ingress
spec:
rules:
- host: my-app.example.com
http:
paths:
- path: /
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: my-app
port:
number: 80
- path: /
pathType: Prefix
backend:
service:
name: my-app-canary
port:
number: 80
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?