Enforcing policy-as-code using Open Policy Agent (OPA) and Conftest can greatly streamline the process of maintaining compliance across both monorepos and polyrepos. By integrating OPA with Conftest, you can define and enforce policies that ensure your code adheres to organizational standards, security requirements, and best practices. This approach also aids in automating security checks within CI/CD pipelines.
For a monorepo, policies can be structured to enforce rules across multiple projects within a single repository. On the other hand, polyrepos require independent policies for each repository. Utilizing Conftest allows testing of these policies against your configuration files or code before deployment, making it easier to catch violations early in the CI/CD process.
package example
# Define a simple policy rule to restrict usage of 'unsafe' functions
deny[{"message": msg}] {
input.function == "eval"
msg = "Usage of 'eval' is prohibited for security reasons."
}
deny[{"message": msg}] {
input.function == "exec"
msg = "Usage of 'exec' is prohibited for security reasons."
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?