How do I enforce policy-as-code for BuildKit using OPA and Conftest?

To enforce policy-as-code for BuildKit using OPA (Open Policy Agent) and Conftest, you can define your policies in Rego language and then use Conftest to test your configurations against these policies. This ensures that your CI/CD pipeline adheres to the defined policies before proceeding with the build process.

Keywords: policy-as-code, BuildKit, OPA, Conftest, DevOps, CI/CD, Rego
Description: This guide covers how to integrate OPA and Conftest to enforce policy-as-code in BuildKit, ensuring compliance in your DevOps pipeline.
# Example policy in a rego file package buildkit # Ensure that only approved images are used allow { input.image in ["trusted-image:latest", "another-approved-image:stable"] } deny { input.image not in ["trusted-image:latest", "another-approved-image:stable"] } # Command to test your build configuration conftest test --policy ./buildkit.rego path/to/your/buildconfig.yaml

Keywords: policy-as-code BuildKit OPA Conftest DevOps CI/CD Rego

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?