Progressive delivery is an essential approach in DevOps to facilitate safe and controlled deployment of applications. With Argo CD, a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes, you can implement progressive delivery for pod scheduling effectively. This enables teams to roll out updates gradually and monitor performance before a full deployment, minimizing the risk of impacting users.
Here are the steps to set up progressive delivery for pod scheduling using Argo CD:
Here's an example of how you can define a basic canary deployment in a Kubernetes manifest managed by Argo CD:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
spec:
containers:
- name: my-app
image: my-app:v1 # Initial version
ports:
- containerPort: 80
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app-canary
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
version: canary
spec:
containers:
- name: my-app
image: my-app:v2 # Updated version
ports:
- containerPort: 80
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?