Progressive delivery is a critical aspect of incident response that enables organizations to gradually roll out changes to their systems while monitoring for issues. Using tools like Argo CD, teams can automate deployments and implement robust strategies for managing incidents effectively.
With Argo CD, you can set up progressive delivery by leveraging canary deployments, blue/green deployments, or feature flags. Here's how you can utilize Argo CD to implement a canary release strategy, where a new version of your application is deployed to a small subset of users before rolling it out to everyone. This helps in identifying issues early on without affecting all users.
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
labels:
app: my-app
spec:
replicas: 5
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
spec:
containers:
- name: my-app
image: my-repo/my-app:v2 # The new version deployed for canary
In the above example, we define a deployment for our application with a new version tagged as v2. Initially, this will be deployed to a small number of replicas so we can monitor its performance.
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?