How do I correlate logs, metrics, and traces for SLIs, SLOs, SLAs?

To effectively correlate logs, metrics, and traces for Service Level Indicators (SLIs), Service Level Objectives (SLOs), and Service Level Agreements (SLAs), you can use observability tools that allow you to collect and visualize data from different sources. Below is a simple example of how to set this up using a monitoring platform.

99.9, // 99.9% availability 'response_time' => 200, // 200 ms response time ]; // Log user requests function log_request($request_time, $response_time) { // Example log entry error_log("Request Time: {$request_time}, Response Time: {$response_time}"); } // Measure availability function check_availability($success_count, $total_requests) { return ($success_count / $total_requests) * 100; } // Example usage log_request(time(), rand(100, 300)); // Simulates logging a request echo "Current Availability: " . check_availability(95, 100) . "%"; // Simulates checking availability ?>

devops logs metrics traces SLIs SLOs SLAs observability monitoring

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?