Achieve zero-downtime deployments for Argo Workflows through strategic practices and container orchestration. This ensures that your applications remain available during updates and deployments, enhancing user experience and minimizing disruptions.
zero-downtime deployments, Argo Workflows, container orchestration, continuous delivery, Kubernetes, DevOps best practices
# Example of zero-downtime deployment strategy for Argo Workflows
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Workflow
metadata:
generateName: zero-downtime-example-
spec:
entrypoint: main
templates:
- name: main
steps:
- - name: deploy-new-version
template: deploy
- - name: upgrade-old-version
template: downgrade
when: "{{steps.deploy-new-version.outputs.status}} == Succeeded"
- name: deploy
container:
image: myapp:latest
command: ["/bin/sh", "-c"]
args: ["echo Deploying new version"]
- name: downgrade
container:
image: myapp:previous
command: ["/bin/sh", "-c"]
args: ["echo Downgrading to previous version if necessary"]
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?