In C++, using mutexes and locks is essential for ensuring thread safety in concurrent programming. To manage these locks efficiently and safely, you can leverage the RAII (Resource Acquisition Is Initialization) pattern. This means that the lifecycle of the lock is tied to the lifetime of an object, ensuring that the lock is always released when the object goes out of scope, even if an exception occurs.
Here’s a simple example demonstrating how to wrap a mutex with RAII in C++:
#include <iostream>
#include <mutex>
#include <thread>
class LockGuard {
public:
LockGuard(std::mutex& mtx) : mtx(mtx) {
mtx.lock();
}
~LockGuard() {
mtx.unlock();
}
private:
std::mutex& mtx;
};
void threadFunction(std::mutex& mtx) {
LockGuard lock(mtx); // Lock is acquired here
std::cout << "Thread is running..." << std::endl;
// Mutex is automatically released when lock goes out of scope
}
int main() {
std::mutex mtx;
std::thread t1(threadFunction, std::ref(mtx));
std::thread t2(threadFunction, std::ref(mtx));
t1.join();
t2.join();
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?