C++ provides powerful algorithms for aggregating values, such as `std::accumulate` and `std::reduce`. These functions are part of the `
The `std::accumulate` function is used to compute the sum of elements in a range, but it can also be used to implement other operations like multiplication, concatenation, etc.
#include <numeric>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::vector numbers = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int sum = std::accumulate(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), 0);
std::cout << "Sum: " << sum << std::endl;
return 0;
}
The `std::reduce` function (introduced in C++17) is similar to `std::accumulate`, but it allows parallel execution and is generally used for more complex cases.
#include <numeric>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::vector numbers = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int sum = std::reduce(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), 0);
std::cout << "Sum: " << sum << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?