The `ranges::views::filter` and `ranges::views::transform` are part of the C++20 Ranges library, enabling a more expressive way to work with sequences of data. These views allow for lazy evaluation, meaning that data is processed only when needed.
The `filter` view is used to select elements from a range that satisfy a specific predicate, while the `transform` view applies a transformation to each element of the range.
Here’s an example demonstrating the use of both `ranges::views::filter` and `ranges::views::transform`:
#include <iostream>
#include <ranges>
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::vector<int> numbers = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
auto filtered_transformed = numbers | std::views::filter([](int n) { return n % 2 == 0; })
| std::views::transform([](int n) { return n * n; });
for (int n : filtered_transformed) {
std::cout << n << " ";
}
return 0;
}
In this example, we filter the numbers to keep only the even ones and then transform each of those numbers to its square. The resulting output will be the squares of even numbers from the original list.
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?