In modern C++ (C++17 and later), you can use `std::optional` in `constexpr` contexts to allow for optional values in compile-time computations. Here's how to leverage `std::optional` in `constexpr` functions.
std::optional, C++17, constexpr, compile-time, optional values, C++ optional example
This example demonstrates using std::optional in a constexpr function, enabling conditional compilation based on the presence of a value.
#include <optional>
#include <iostream>
constexpr std::optional safe_divide(int a, int b) {
return b != 0 ? std::optional(a / b) : std::nullopt;
}
int main() {
constexpr auto result1 = safe_divide(10, 2);
constexpr auto result2 = safe_divide(10, 0);
std::cout << "Result 1: " << (result1.has_value() ? std::to_string(result1.value()) : "undefined") << std::endl;
std::cout << "Result 2: " << (result2.has_value() ? std::to_string(result2.value()) : "undefined") << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?