In C++, std::stack
is a container adaptor that provides a LIFO (Last In, First Out) data structure. You can add elements to a stack using the push
method or the emplace
method. While both methods achieve the result of adding an item to the stack, they have some differences in usage and performance.
The push
method adds a copy of the element to the stack, whereas emplace
constructs the element in place. This means that emplace
can be more efficient, especially for complex objects, as it avoids the overhead of an additional copy operation.
Here is an example demonstrating the difference between push
and emplace
when adding elements to a stack:
#include <iostream>
#include <stack>
class MyClass {
public:
MyClass(int x) : value(x) {
std::cout << "MyClass constructor called with value: " << x << std::endl;
}
int value;
};
int main() {
std::stack myStack;
// Using push
MyClass obj1(10);
myStack.push(obj1); // A copy of obj1 is pushed onto the stack
// Using emplace
myStack.emplace(20); // Constructs MyClass(20) in place
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?