In C++, both emplace
and push
can be used to insert elements into a std::priority_queue
, but they work in slightly different ways. Understanding the differences can help you write more efficient code.
The push
method takes an object by value, which means it copies the object if it’s not already a temporary. This can lead to unnecessary overhead, especially if the object is expensive to copy.
On the other hand, emplace
constructs the object in place, forwarding the arguments you provide directly to the constructor of the element being inserted. This can improve performance by eliminating the need for an extra copy or move.
Here’s an example comparing emplace
and push
with std::priority_queue
:
#include <iostream>
#include <queue>
struct Item {
int value;
Item(int v) : value(v) {}
bool operator<(const Item& other) const {
return value < other.value; // For max heap
}
};
int main() {
std::priority_queue
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?