In C++, both `emplace` and `push` methods are used to add elements to a `std::list`, but they operate slightly differently. The `emplace` method constructs the element in place, allowing for more efficient memory usage as it can circumvent the need for copying or moving the object. On the other hand, the `push_back` and `push_front` methods simply push a copy (or move) of an existing object to the end or front of the list, respectively.
Here’s a basic example demonstrating the differences between `emplace` and `push` in a `std::list`:
#include
#include
#include
int main() {
std::list<:string> myList;
// Using push_back to add an element
myList.push_back("Hello");
// Using emplace_back to add an element
myList.emplace_back("World");
// Printing the elements in the list
for (const auto& str : myList) {
std::cout << str << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?