In C++, both emplace
and push
are methods provided to insert elements into a std::deque
. However, they work differently in terms of how they handle object construction and how efficiently they manage memory.
The push_back
and push_front
methods of std::deque
are used to insert elements at the end and at the beginning of the deque, respectively. They take an object as a parameter, which means that the object will be copied or moved into the deque.
On the other hand, emplace_back
and emplace_front
directly construct the object in-place. This means that instead of copying or moving an existing object, emplace
takes the constructor arguments for the object and creates it directly in the deque, which can lead to better performance, especially for complex objects.
#include <iostream>
#include <deque>
#include <string>
int main() {
std::deque<:string> myDeque;
// Using push_back
myDeque.push_back("Hello");
myDeque.push_back("World");
// Using emplace_back
myDeque.emplace_back("Welcome");
myDeque.emplace_back("to C++");
// Display the contents of the deque
for (const auto &word : myDeque) {
std::cout << word << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?