In C++, the `std::queue` container does not provide direct support for sorting operations, as it is designed specifically for queue operations (FIFO - First In First Out). However, to sort the elements of a queue, you can first transfer the elements to a different container like `std::vector`, sort it there, and then transfer it back to the queue.
This approach allows you to sort the elements using `std::sort` or `std::stable_sort`. The regular `std::sort` is not stable, meaning that it may not preserve the relative order of equivalent elements, whereas `std::stable_sort` guarantees that order is preserved.
Here is an example of how to use `std::queue`, `std::vector`, and the `std::sort` function.
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main() {
std::queue q;
q.push(4);
q.push(1);
q.push(3);
q.push(2);
// Step 1: Transfer elements to a vector
std::vector vec;
while (!q.empty()) {
vec.push_back(q.front());
q.pop();
}
// Step 2: Sort the vector
std::sort(vec.begin(), vec.end()); // For stable sort, use std::stable_sort
// Step 3: Transfer sorted elements back to the queue
for (const auto& val : vec) {
q.push(val);
}
// Display sorted queue
while (!q.empty()) {
std::cout << q.front() << " ";
q.pop();
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?