In C++, std::map
is an associative container that stores elements in key-value pairs. Since it is inherently sorted by keys, you don't need to sort it explicitly. However, if you want to sort by values or maintain the order while performing stable operations, you might need to utilize additional structures.
Here's how you can do that by first copying the elements to a vector, sorting it, and then if needed, using std::stable_sort
to maintain the relative order of elements with equivalent values.
#include <iostream>
#include <map>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
int main() {
std::map myMap = {
{1, "Apple"},
{2, "Orange"},
{3, "Banana"},
{4, "Grape"},
{5, "Banana"}
};
// Copy elements to a vector
std::vector<:pair std::string>> vec(myMap.begin(), myMap.end());
// Sort by values using stable_sort
std::stable_sort(vec.begin(), vec.end(), [](const auto& a, const auto& b) {
return a.second < b.second;
});
// Print sorted elements
for (const auto& pair : vec) {
std::cout << pair.first << ": " << pair.second << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?