Serialization and deserialization of C++ types are crucial for various applications, especially when it comes to data storage or network communication. With the introduction of `std::expected` in C++20, it allows you to convey expected and unexpected outcomes in a more structured way. This post explains how to serialize and deserialize `std::expected` objects.
To serialize an `std::expected
#include
#include
#include
// Example of a serialization function
template
std::string serialize(const std::expected& ex) {
if (ex.has_value()) {
return "Value: " + std::to_string(ex.value());
} else {
return "Error: " + std::to_string(ex.error());
}
}
To deserialize, we will parse the string representation back into an `std::expected` object.
// Example of a deserialization function
template
std::expected deserialize(const std::string& str) {
// A simple mock-up to demonstrate the concept
if (str.rfind("Value:", 0) == 0) {
T value = std::stod(str.substr(6)); // Assumes T can be initialized from string
return std::expected(value);
} else {
E error = static_cast(std::stoi(str.substr(7))); // Assumes E is integer for simplicity
return std::unexpected(error);
}
}
This approach gives you a straightforward way to serialize and deserialize `std::expected` instances. Adjust the serialization logic as needed based on the types you're working with, including custom objects.
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?