Data races in C++ occur when multiple threads access the same memory location simultaneously, and at least one of the accesses is a write. Thread Sanitizer (TSan) helps detect these data races, allowing developers to resolve them before they lead to undefined behavior or bugs. Here are some strategies to resolve data races in your C++ applications:
std::atomic
) when incrementing or accessing shared variables to ensure thread-safe operations.Here’s an example to illustrate the implementation of mutexes to resolve data races:
// Example of serializing access to shared data using mutex
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
#include <mutex>
std::mutex mtx; // Mutex for protecting shared resource
int shared_data = 0;
void increment() {
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) {
mtx.lock(); // Lock the mutex
++shared_data; // Increment the shared resource
mtx.unlock(); // Unlock the mutex
}
}
int main() {
std::thread t1(increment);
std::thread t2(increment);
t1.join();
t2.join();
std::cout << "Final value of shared_data: " << shared_data << std::endl; // Output should be 2000
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?