In C++, `std::forward_list` is a singly linked list that does not support direct capacity management like `std::vector` or `std::deque`. This means you cannot reserve capacity or shrink-to-fit an `std::forward_list` because it dynamically allocates memory as elements are added or removed.
To manage the memory and ensure efficient use, you can manually control the addition and removal of elements by using its member functions like push_front
, pop_front
, and iterators.
Here’s an example of using a `std::forward_list`:
#include <forward_list>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::forward_list flist;
// Adding elements
flist.push_front(10);
flist.push_front(20);
flist.push_front(30);
// Displaying elements
for (const auto& elem : flist) {
std::cout << elem << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
// Removing elements
flist.pop_front(); // removes the first element (30)
// Displaying remaining elements
for (const auto& elem : flist) {
std::cout << elem << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?