// Note: std::set does not provide a direct way to reserve capacity like vectors do,
// but you can create a set of a specific size using a custom allocator.
#include
#include
#include
#include
std::mutex mtx; // Mutex for thread safety
void insertIntoSet(std::set& mySet, int value) {
std::lock_guard<:mutex> lock(mtx); // Lock the mutex for thread safety
mySet.insert(value); // Insert into the set
}
int main() {
std::set mySet;
// Launch multiple threads to insert values into the set
std::thread t1(insertIntoSet, std::ref(mySet), 1);
std::thread t2(insertIntoSet, std::ref(mySet), 2);
std::thread t3(insertIntoSet, std::ref(mySet), 3);
t1.join();
t2.join();
t3.join();
// Output the values in the set
for (const auto& value : mySet) {
std::cout << value << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?