When dealing with large datasets in C++, using `std::map` can provide a stable iteration order based on the keys. The data in a `std::map` is stored in a balanced tree structure, typically a Red-Black Tree, which ensures that the elements are always sorted by their keys. This property is essential for applications that require consistent and predictable ordering of data when iterated over.
Here is a simple example demonstrating how to use `std::map` for stable iteration order:
#include <iostream>
#include <map>
#include <string>
int main() {
std::map<std::string, int> ageMap;
// Inserting data into the map.
ageMap["Alice"] = 30;
ageMap["Bob"] = 25;
ageMap["Charlie"] = 35;
// Iterating over the map to print the elements.
for (const auto &pair : ageMap) {
std::cout << pair.first << ": " << pair.second << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?