In performance-sensitive code, ensuring a stable iteration order when using `std::deque` is crucial. Although `std::deque` provides fast insertion and deletion at both ends, the order of iteration can be influenced by the underlying implementation. Therefore, it's essential to maintain the order of elements explicitly if your application relies on it.
One common strategy is to use a vector to encapsulate the iteration, making sure that you convert your `std::deque` to a `std::vector` before iteration, as vectors guarantee stable iteration order.
// Example of maintaining stable iteration order with std::deque
#include
#include
#include
int main() {
std::deque dq = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
// Convert to vector for stable iteration
std::vector vec(dq.begin(), dq.end());
// Iterate over the vector
for (int value : vec) {
std::cout << value << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?