When working with large datasets in C++, maintaining a stable iteration order while using `std::deque` can be challenging. A stable iteration order ensures that elements are processed in the order they were inserted, even when the data structure is modified. To achieve this, it is important to be aware of the properties of `std::deque` and use proper techniques when iterating through the container.
One method is to avoid altering the order of elements while iterating. Instead of removing or adding elements directly during iteration, you can store elements to be added or removed in a temporary structure and process those after the iteration is complete. This practice can help ensure that your iteration order remains consistent.
#include <deque>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::deque data = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
// Temporary containers for safe modifications
std::deque toRemove;
std::deque toAdd;
// Iterate and modify safely
for (auto it = data.begin(); it != data.end(); ) {
if (*it % 2 == 0) { // For even numbers
toRemove.push_back(*it); // Mark for removal
it = data.erase(it); // Remove from the original deque
} else {
++it; // Move to the next element
}
}
// Process removals
for (int num : toRemove) {
std::cout << "Removed: " << num << std::endl;
}
// Example: Add elements after iteration if needed
toAdd.push_back(6);
for (int num : toAdd) {
data.push_back(num);
}
// Output the final deque
std::cout << "Final deque: ";
for (int num : data) {
std::cout << num << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?