When working with std::deque
in C++, it's crucial to maintain a stable iteration order, especially in embedded systems where resources may be constrained. It’s important to understand how std::deque
manages elements to ensure reliable iteration and avoid unexpected behavior.
In embedded applications, performance and predictability are key. To achieve a stable iteration order with std::deque
, you can make sure to avoid frequent insertions or deletions from the middle of the container, as this can cause elements to be relocated, affecting the iteration order.
Also, using iterators effectively allows you to traverse the container without risk of invalidation from modifications, provided these modifications occur at the ends of the deque.
Here's a simple example of how to use std::deque
with stable iteration in C++:
#include <iostream>
#include <deque>
int main() {
std::deque<int> myDeque;
// Add elements to the ends (stable operation)
myDeque.push_back(1);
myDeque.push_back(2);
myDeque.push_front(0);
// Iterating through the deque
for(auto it = myDeque.begin(); it != myDeque.end(); ++it) {
std::cout << *it << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?