This guide discusses how to efficiently merge two std::vector containers in C++, focusing on performance-sensitive scenarios. We'll explore techniques that minimize copying and maximize efficiency.
merge, std::vector, C++, performance, efficiency, containers, programming
// Efficiently merge two std::vector containers
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::vector<int> vector1 = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
std::vector<int> vector2 = {6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
// Resize vector1 to accommodate elements from vector2
vector1.reserve(vector1.size() + vector2.size());
// Move elements from vector2 to vector1
vector1.insert(vector1.end(), std::make_move_iterator(vector2.begin()), std::make_move_iterator(vector2.end()));
// Clear vector2 after moving
vector2.clear();
// Output the merged vector
for (const auto& val : vector1) {
std::cout << val << ' ';
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?