Merging two containers in C++ efficiently, especially when dealing with large datasets, is a common requirement. Using `std::vector` to perform this task can lead to significant performance improvements when handled correctly. Below is a simple and efficient way to merge two `std::vector` containers.
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
void mergeVectors(const std::vector<int>& vec1, const std::vector<int>& vec2, std::vector<int>& result) {
// Reserve space for the merged vector to avoid reallocations
result.reserve(vec1.size() + vec2.size());
// Merge both vectors
result.insert(result.end(), vec1.begin(), vec1.end());
result.insert(result.end(), vec2.begin(), vec2.end());
// Sort the merged vector if needed
std::sort(result.begin(), result.end());
}
int main() {
std::vector<int> vector1 = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9};
std::vector<int> vector2 = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10};
std::vector<int> mergedVector;
mergeVectors(vector1, vector2, mergedVector);
for (const int& elem : mergedVector) {
std::cout << elem << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?