Merging two containers using `std::set` in multithreaded code can be achieved efficiently with the help of C++ Standard Library features. Here we outline how to perform this operation while ensuring thread safety and optimal performance.
#include <iostream>
#include <set>
#include <thread>
#include <mutex>
std::mutex mtx;
void mergeSets(const std::set<int>& set1, const std::set<int>& set2, std::set<int>& result) {
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(mtx); // Locking for thread safety
result.insert(set1.begin(), set1.end());
result.insert(set2.begin(), set2.end());
}
int main() {
std::set<int> set1 = {1, 2, 3, 4};
std::set<int> set2 = {3, 4, 5, 6};
std::set<int> mergedSet;
std::thread t1(mergeSets, std::cref(set1), std::cref(set2), std::ref(mergedSet));
t1.join(); // Wait for thread to complete
// Display results
for (auto elem : mergedSet) {
std::cout << elem << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?