In C++, the std::unordered_set
is a container that provides fast access to elements and allows for unique values. Merging and splicing sequences with std::unordered_set
involves inserting elements from one set to another while maintaining uniqueness.
Here’s a quick overview of how to merge two std::unordered_set
instances:
std::unordered_set
instances and populate them with values.insert
method to add elements from one set to the other.Splicing, however, is not a direct operation since the std::unordered_set
does not support splicing like std::list
or std::deque
. Instead, you would typically use the erase
method to remove items from one set after they've been added to another.
#include <iostream>
#include <unordered_set>
int main() {
std::unordered_set set1 = {1, 2, 3};
std::unordered_set set2 = {3, 4, 5};
// Merge set2 into set1
set1.insert(set2.begin(), set2.end());
std::cout << "Merged set: ";
for (int num : set1) {
std::cout << num << ' ';
}
std::cout << std::endl;
// Optional: clear set2 after merging (splicing)
set2.clear();
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?