In C++, the `std::set` container provides a way to store unique elements in a sorted manner. Merging two sets or splicing sequences can be done using set operations. This is particularly useful when you want to combine data from different sets while retaining their uniqueness and order.
To merge two sets, you can use the `insert` function, which allows you to add elements from one set to another.
Splicing in sets typically refers to transferring elements from one container to another while maintaining their values and not duplicating them. However, in the case of `std::set`, this operation is not directly available since sets do not support splicing in the same way other containers like `std::list` do.
#include
#include
int main() {
std::set setA = {1, 2, 3, 4};
std::set setB = {3, 4, 5, 6};
// Merging setB into setA
setA.insert(setB.begin(), setB.end());
// Displaying merged set
std::cout << "Merged Set: ";
for (const auto &value : setA) {
std::cout << value << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?