In C++, the `std::list` class provides several member functions that allow you to manipulate sequences easily. Merging two lists and splicing elements from one list to another is straightforward with these member functions.
The `merge()` function can be used to merge two sorted lists into one. It merges the elements of the second list into the first list in sorted order.
The `splice()` function allows you to transfer elements from one list to another without invoking the copy or move constructors, offering efficiency advantages.
#include <iostream>
#include <list>
int main() {
std::list<int> list1 = {1, 3, 5};
std::list<int> list2 = {2, 4, 6};
// Merging list2 into list1
list1.merge(list2);
std::cout << "Merged list: ";
for (const int &num : list1) {
std::cout << num << ' ';
}
std::cout << std::endl;
// Splicing elements
std::list<int> splicedList;
splicedList.splice(splicedList.end(), list1, ++list1.begin(), list1.end()); // Splice all but the first element
std::cout << "Spliced list: ";
for (const int &num : splicedList) {
std::cout << num << ' ';
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?