The std::deque
(double-ended queue) in C++ is a versatile data structure that allows for efficient addition and removal of elements from both ends. Merging and splicing are two operations that can be performed on deques to manipulate their contents. This article explains how you can merge two deques and splice elements from one deque into another.
To merge two deques, you can use the insert
method to append elements from one deque to another. Here's a basic example:
#include <iostream>
#include <deque>
int main() {
std::deque<int> deque1 = {1, 2, 3};
std::deque<int> deque2 = {4, 5, 6};
// Merging deque1 and deque2
deque1.insert(deque1.end(), deque2.begin(), deque2.end());
// Output the merged deque
for (int num : deque1) {
std::cout << num << " ";
}
return 0;
}
Splicing involves transferring a portion of one deque to another without copying elements. This can be done using the splice
method:
#include <iostream>
#include <deque>
int main() {
std::deque<int> source = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
std::deque<int> target;
// Splicing first two elements from source into target
target.splice(target.end(), source, source.begin(), source.begin() + 2);
// Output the target deque
for (int num : target) {
std::cout << num << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?