In C++, you can merge and splice sequences using `std::array` by utilizing the features of standard algorithms such as `std::copy` for merging or modifying arrays. Below is an example demonstrating how to do this.
merge, splice, std::array, C++ programming, algorithms
This example shows how to concatenate two arrays and splice in elements using std::array in C++. Learn to perform these operations effectively.
#include <iostream>
#include <array>
#include <algorithm>
int main() {
std::array arr1 = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
std::array arr2 = {6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
std::array mergedArr;
// Merging two arrays
std::copy(arr1.begin(), arr1.end(), mergedArr.begin());
std::copy(arr2.begin(), arr2.end(), mergedArr.begin() + arr1.size());
// Splicing in a new array segment
std::array newSegment = {11, 12};
std::copy(newSegment.begin(), newSegment.end(), mergedArr.begin() + 5);
// Output the merged array
for (int num : mergedArr) {
std::cout << num << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?