Iterating over a `std::unordered_map` in C++ can present challenges, especially when the map is being modified concurrently. However, there are safe and efficient strategies to handle such situations in performance-sensitive code.
When you need to remove elements from a `std::unordered_map` while iterating over it, the key is to use iterators correctly to ensure you do not invalidate them. You can use the `erase` method to safely remove elements while iterating. Here's how to do this:
#include
#include
int main() {
std::unordered_map myMap = {
{1, "One"},
{2, "Two"},
{3, "Three"}
};
for (auto it = myMap.begin(); it != myMap.end(); ) {
if (it->first % 2 == 0) {
it = myMap.erase(it); // Erase returns the next iterator
} else {
++it; // Move to the next element
}
}
for (const auto& pair : myMap) {
std::cout << pair.first << ": " << pair.second << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
For scenarios where modifications can occur concurrently (multiple threads), consider using mutexes or other synchronization mechanisms to prevent data races and ensure thread safety. Using concurrent data structures may also be warranted if performance demands high concurrent access.
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?