Iterating safely over a std::set in C++ when modifications may occur can be challenging. A common approach involves using iterators while being cautious about the modifications. In performance-sensitive code, it's critical to minimize overhead while ensuring that the iteration process is stable. One effective method is to gather the modifications in a temporary container, allowing the iteration to complete without interference.
Here’s a brief example illustrating how to safely iterate over a std::set while modifying it:
#include
#include
#include
int main() {
std::set mySet = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
std::vector toRemove; // Vector to hold elements to remove
// Initial iteration to collect elements to remove
for (auto it = mySet.begin(); it != mySet.end(); ) {
if (*it % 2 == 0) { // Condition for removal
toRemove.push_back(*it); // Collect element for later removal
it++; // Advance the iterator
} else {
it++; // Advance the iterator
}
}
// Now, perform the actual removal outside the iteration
for (int num : toRemove) {
mySet.erase(num);
}
// Display the modified set
for (const auto &num : mySet) {
std::cout << num << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?