When working with large datasets in C++, particularly when using `std::set`, safe iteration during modification is critical to avoid undefined behavior. The best approach is to make a copy of the `std::set` and iterate over that copy while allowing modifications on the original set. This ensures that you do not invalidate the iterator during modifications.
#include
#include
void safeIteration(std::set& dataSet) {
// Create a copy of the original set for safe iteration
std::set copyDataSet = dataSet;
for (const int& value : copyDataSet) {
std::cout << value << " ";
// Perform modifications on the original set
if (value % 2 == 0) {
dataSet.erase(value); // Remove even numbers from the original set
}
}
}
int main() {
std::set mySet = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
safeIteration(mySet);
// Print remaining elements in the original set
std::cout << "\nRemaining elements: ";
for (const int& value : mySet) {
std::cout << value << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?