Iterating safely over a `std::map` in multithreaded code can be challenging, as modifications to the map while iterating can lead to undefined behavior. To ensure safety, one approach is to use mutexes to lock the map during iteration. This prevents other threads from modifying the map while it is being accessed. Another method is to use copy-on-write strategies or to maintain a snapshot of the map for reading purposes.
Here’s an example of how to iterate safely using mutexes:
#include <map>
#include <mutex>
#include <thread>
#include <iostream>
std::map myMap;
std::mutex mapMutex;
void modifyMap() {
std::lock_guard<:mutex> lock(mapMutex);
myMap[1] = "First Entry";
myMap[2] = "Second Entry";
}
void readMap() {
std::lock_guard<:mutex> lock(mapMutex);
for (const auto& pair : myMap) {
std::cout << pair.first << ": " << pair.second << std::endl;
}
}
int main() {
std::thread t1(modifyMap);
std::thread t2(readMap);
t1.join();
t2.join();
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?