When working with large datasets in C++, iterating safely over a `std::map` that is being modified can be challenging. To avoid issues such as invalid iterators and undefined behavior, it is essential to understand the appropriate methodologies for synchronization and iteration.
One of the safest ways to iterate while allowing modifications is to use a copy of the keys or the values of the `std::map`. This ensures that even if the original map is modified during iteration, you are working with a stable set of data.
std::map myMap = {{1, "one"}, {2, "two"}, {3, "three"}};
std::vector keys;
for (const auto& pair : myMap) {
keys.push_back(pair.first); // Store keys in a separate vector
}
for (int key : keys) {
// You can modify the map here, like removing an element
if (key == 2) {
myMap.erase(key);
}
std::cout << myMap[key] << std::endl; // Safe to access
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?