Iterating over a `std::deque` in a multithreaded environment while handling modifications can be challenging due to potential data races. To ensure safety, it's crucial to implement proper synchronization mechanisms like mutexes to protect the data structure while iterating.
Below is an example of how to safely iterate over a `std::deque` while allowing modifications from other threads:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
std::deque myDeque;
std::mutex dequeMutex;
void modifyDeque() {
for (int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(100));
std::lock_guard<:mutex> lock(dequeMutex);
myDeque.push_back(i);
std::cout << "Added: " << i << std::endl;
}
}
void iterateDeque() {
std::lock_guard<:mutex> lock(dequeMutex);
for (const auto& item : myDeque) {
std::cout << "Item: " << item << std::endl;
}
}
int main() {
std::thread t1(modifyDeque);
std::thread t2(iterateDeque);
t1.join();
t2.join();
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?