Iterating over a `std::deque` in C++ while it is being modified can lead to undefined behavior if not handled properly. When working with large datasets, it's crucial to ensure that iterators remain valid throughout the modification process. Here are some strategies for safely iterating over a `std::deque` while modifying it:
const int SIZE = 1000000;
std::deque myDeque;
// Fill the deque with large dataset
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; ++i) {
myDeque.push_back(i);
}
// Modify deque while iterating safely
for (size_t i = 0; i < myDeque.size(); ++i) {
if (myDeque[i] % 2 == 0) {
myDeque.pop_front(); // This would be safe as we're using an index
--i; // Adjust the index if needed to check next element
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?