In C++, the `std::set` container provides an efficient way to store unique elements in a sorted order. To insert elements into a `std::set`, the `insert` method can be utilized, which will ensure that no duplicates are added.
Erasing elements is equally straightforward with the `erase` method. Both operations are implemented to provide logarithmic complexity, ensuring efficiency even with larger datasets.
Below is an example demonstrating how to insert and erase elements in a `std::set`:
#include <iostream>
#include <set>
int main() {
std::set mySet;
// Inserting elements
mySet.insert(5);
mySet.insert(10);
mySet.insert(3);
std::cout << "Set elements after insertion: ";
for (const int& element : mySet) {
std::cout << element << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
// Erasing an element
mySet.erase(10);
std::cout << "Set elements after erasing 10: ";
for (const int& element : mySet) {
std::cout << element << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?