C++ offers a powerful standard library that includes various container types, one of which is the `std::list`. The `std::list` is a doubly linked list that allows for efficient insertion and deletion of elements at any position, making it an ideal choice for scenarios where these operations need to be performed frequently.
Inserting and erasing elements in a `std::list` is efficient because the operations do not require shifting elements, as is the case with vector or array types. Here’s an example showcasing how to perform these operations:
#include <iostream>
#include <list>
int main() {
std::list<int> myList;
// Inserting elements
myList.push_back(10); // Insert 10 at the end
myList.push_front(20); // Insert 20 at the beginning
auto it = myList.begin();
std::advance(it, 1); // Move iterator to the second position
myList.insert(it, 30); // Insert 30 at the second position
std::cout << "List after insertion: ";
for (const auto& elem : myList) {
std::cout << elem << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
// Erasing elements
myList.erase(it); // Erase the element at the second position
std::cout << "List after erasure: ";
for (const auto& elem : myList) {
std::cout << elem << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?