To implement the Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) in C++, we can use dynamic programming for an efficient solution. The core idea is to maintain an array where each element at index i represents the length of the longest increasing subsequence that ends with the element at index i.
Here's an example code for the Longest Increasing Subsequence algorithm in C++:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;
int longestIncreasingSubsequence(vector<int> &nums) {
if (nums.empty()) return 0;
vector<int> dp(nums.size(), 1);
for (int i = 1; i < nums.size(); ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < i; ++j) {
if (nums[i] > nums[j]) {
dp[i] = max(dp[i], dp[j] + 1);
}
}
}
return *max_element(dp.begin(), dp.end());
}
int main() {
vector<int> nums = {10, 9, 2, 5, 3, 7, 101, 18};
cout << "Length of Longest Increasing Subsequence is: " << longestIncreasingSubsequence(nums) << endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?