How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::vector for embedded targets?

In C++, when working with `std::vector` to find elements using custom comparators on embedded targets, you can utilize algorithms like `std::find_if` or `std::find` in combination with a custom comparator. This approach is efficient for embedded systems where resources are limited. Below is an example that demonstrates how to accomplish this.

custom comparators, std::vector, find elements, embedded systems, C++ algorithms

Learn how to efficiently find elements in a std::vector using custom comparators in C++, suitable for embedded systems applications.

#include #include #include struct CustomComparator { bool operator()(int a, int b) { return a < b; // Custom comparison logic } }; int main() { std::vector numbers = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50}; int target = 30; // Using std::find_if with custom comparator auto it = std::find_if(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), [&target](int value) { return value == target; }); if (it != numbers.end()) { std::cout << "Found: " << *it << std::endl; } else { std::cout << "Not Found" << std::endl; } return 0; }

custom comparators std::vector find elements embedded systems C++ algorithms

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?