In C++ STL, the std::set
container allows you to manage a collection of unique elements in sorted order. When dealing with large datasets, you might find yourself needing to customize the sorting behavior of the elements. This can be achieved with custom comparators.
Using a custom comparator can help you define your own rules for ordering the elements in the set. Below is an example of how to use a custom comparator with std::set
:
#include <iostream>
#include <set>
#include <string>
// Custom comparator to compare strings in reverse order
struct ReverseComparator {
bool operator()(const std::string &a, const std::string &b) const {
return a > b; // Reverse alphabetical order
}
};
int main() {
// Define a set with the custom comparator
std::set<:string reversecomparator> mySet;
// Insert elements into the set
mySet.insert("apple");
mySet.insert("banana");
mySet.insert("cherry");
// Display the elements in the set
for (const auto &item : mySet) {
std::cout << item << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?