In performance-sensitive C++ applications, when using `std::deque`, you might need to find elements using custom comparators. This can be critical for maintaining efficiency while ensuring that your specific criteria for element comparison are respected. The following example demonstrates how to accomplish this using a custom comparator and standard algorithms.
#include <iostream>
#include <deque>
#include <algorithm>
// Custom comparator
bool customComparator(const int& a, const int& b) {
return a > b; // Example: Find if a is greater than b
}
int main() {
std::deque<int> myDeque = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50};
// Using std::find_if with a custom comparator
auto it = std::find_if(myDeque.begin(), myDeque.end(),
[](const int& value) { return customComparator(value, 25); });
// Check if element was found
if (it != myDeque.end()) {
std::cout << "Found element: " << *it << std::endl;
} else {
std::cout << "Element not found." << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?