Learn how to find elements in a std::deque using custom comparators, especially for embedded systems where performance and memory usage are crucial. This guide will help you effectively utilize C++ STL containers with tailored comparison logic.
std::deque, custom comparator, C++, embedded systems, STL, algorithms, C++ programming, find elements
To find elements in a `std::deque` using a custom comparator, you can define a comparator function or a functor and use algorithms like `std::find_if`. Below is an example demonstrating this approach:
#include <iostream>
#include <deque>
#include <algorithm>
// Custom comparator
struct CustomComparator {
int targetValue;
CustomComparator(int value) : targetValue(value) {}
bool operator()(int element) const {
return element == targetValue;
}
};
int main() {
std::deque myDeque = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
int valueToFind = 3;
CustomComparator comp(valueToFind);
auto it = std::find_if(myDeque.begin(), myDeque.end(), comp);
if (it != myDeque.end()) {
std::cout << "Element found: " << *it << std::endl;
} else {
std::cout << "Element not found" << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?