When working with large datasets in C++ and using `std::unordered_map`, it's essential to handle element removal correctly while iterating. Directly modifying the container while iterating can invalidate iterators and lead to undefined behavior. Here’s how you can safely erase elements in an `std::unordered_map`.
#include <iostream>
#include <unordered_map>
int main() {
std::unordered_map<int, std::string> myMap = {
{1, "one"},
{2, "two"},
{3, "three"},
{4, "four"},
{5, "five"}
};
for (auto it = myMap.begin(); it != myMap.end(); ) {
if (it->first % 2 == 0) { // Remove even keys
it = myMap.erase(it); // erase returns the next iterator
} else {
++it; // Increment only if not erased
}
}
// Print remaining elements
for (const auto& pair : myMap) {
std::cout << pair.first << ": " << pair.second << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?